"There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events."
I'm sorry, this study from NEJM can't possibly be true. It agrees with what the "so-called-experts" have been saying for over a year, and we know they can't be right.
I think we got it right here a few months ago. Ivermectin treats the things it was always known to treat quite well. Those were all diseases that would make getting covid an even bigger problem, sometimes killing you. Therefore, when you threw out the fraudulent studies and corrected as well as possible for the wildly different treatment parameters in the meta-analysis and still had a little ivermectin effect, there was a simple explanation. That was, of course, rejected. Ivermectin was a good medicine to use in countries that high rates of those parasites, diseases, and conditions that ivermectin works on, because fixing those things made it easier for your body to fight off covid.
In countries with those things under control, it helped not at all.