Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Selective Pressure

There is another take on how poorly boys do in our schools, one that notes some positives and provides more explanation about girls’ experience. My brother mentioned years ago that schools generically favoring girls might not mean that boys ultimately got a worse education. Learning that life isn’t fair and that the rules of school are not exactly the rules of life is actually some advantage for boys overall.

Some boys, anyway. We are still stuck with the problem of an unacceptable percentage of boys not ever catching on in life.

There is more genetic variation in boys to begin with. Males are “an enormous genetic experiment carried out by females.” Boys have more range in height, more range in IQ, more range in coordination, more albinism, autism – everything. Any system which is geared to the general middle of the bell curve is going to have more boys falling off the edges. A girl at any given point toward the extremes may be as likely as a boy to not fit the system – but there will be more boys at those points. Rather than a boy problem per se, we may be seeing a “doesn’t fit” rate that illustrates the educational system’s problem with anyone outside the middle range, though we perceive that as a boy problem.

A system which includes the entire population must always be under time and financial pressure to address the great middle. The actual difference in the bell curve of boys and the bell curve of girls is persistent, but not visually dramatic. To better visualise what I am describing, imagine a steeper bell curve overlaid on a flatter one. A school system addressing itself to the needs of the midline is going to favor whoever is under that steeper curve, while the denizens under the flatter curve are more likely to have problems.

So let’s keep that in the back of our minds throughout the rest of the discussion. What I am describing as the boys’ situation might turn out to be “what happens beyond one standard deviation in either direction, more of whom will be boys.”

Greater selective pressure creates more spectacular successes and failures. If the selective pressure on boys in school is greater, boys will respond by developing more strategies. This is in fact what we find. Boys are much more likely to choose alternative routes to success. My oldest son developed dramatic self-monitoring and self awareness skills not present in his earliest years. He also (not consciously) poured much of his energy into oral and written fluency, which were excellent school-skills and kept teachers off his back about his squirmy, chattering behavior and his poor fine-motor skills. He became articulate, witty, and charming in a way adults like. Other boys become immersed in something school-usable, such as computers or natural science – or which at least develops skills that are school-usable, such as role-playing games, military info, or sports statistics.

Boys move out into the worlds of machines or sports to find an identity more frequently. Male musicians form more of their own bands and exchange their musical skills. Females are more likely to keep their musical abilities in adult-supervised tracks. Boys tell more jokes, do more comic voices, tell more stories – they perform in conversation much more - but are less often trying out for the school play. “Trying out” for school plays is barely known among boys. If you show up, you’re in somewhere, and have you got a friend who would like to be a milkman in scene three?

Boys bust out of the system more often, for good or ill. They are much more likely to be autodidacts. My second son was a daydreamer and sneak-reader. Those usually survive but don’t excel in school, though they eventually find something school-useful to lean on by the end. In a small class in a small Christian school, his eccentricities were more charming than irritating and he throve. In his one large classroom in preschool, no one picked up on the fact that he could already read well. Public school would have been a roll of the dice for him.

Boys find alternate routes off the bottom end as well: crime, bullying, teasing, passive-aggressive stances. Those are routes to succeed by salvaging something in the short term, at long term cost.


ELC said...

What a pack of lies! Everybody knows boys and girls are the same so they have to be treated the same!

You need The Larry Summers Treatment!


bs king said...

Ah sports statistics as a method of getting through life. My father has always used this, and now my husband does. He does health insurance sales and I really amazed how many doors being able to rattle of some good stats opens for him.

There's got to be some sort of signaling going on there....because this statistics-speak seems to conjure a lot more trust between men than is totally rational.

Anonymous said...

As part of becoming a teacher, a second and since-abandoned second career, I attended a guest lecture by a (female) education professor. She showed a film that claimed to show that females get the short end of the stick in science. As my sister and mother had master’s degrees respectively in engineering and biology, I was somewhat skeptical.

The education professor did not help her case with this introduction: “ My father was a physician. My brother was a physician. And here I am, in Education.” ( My suggestion: compare SAT scores. One has to have limited ability in critical thinking to accept all the conjectures masquerading as fact in the Education field.)

In my search to find studies to refute that brain-dead ed school prof, I found out the same that you did. Males have more variation. More geniuses, more mentally retarded.

My sister’s best friend from high school could not make the same claim as the ed school prof, as both her parents were MDs. In research for her doctoral dissertation, my sister’s friend found out that there was a genetic component to the group differences in math scores between males and females. Not surprisingly, she found it impossible to get a faculty position with such a politically incorrect dissertation.

The trend to reduce or eliminate recess in elementary school, with the aim to have them learn even more, will hurt boys more than girls, as boys have a greater need to let their yayas out.

Ben Wyman said...

I would like my tombstone to read "More Charming Than Irritating. He Throve."

Anonymous said...



情趣用品,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,日本AV,寄情築園小遊戲,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,色情遊戲,一葉情貼圖片區,色情網站,色情影片,微風成人, 嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人影片,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,080視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室



麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打

麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,線上遊戲,矽谷麻將,明星3缺一,橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,遊戲區,電玩快打,cs online

情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊