I have said “There is no system” but I believe there are systems at a smaller level. Collections of many school systems are not
necessarily an Educational System but they do qualify as systems in their own
right. There is a Health Care System, because the parts interact and affect
each other, but I think the systemic nature of this is overestimated. We don’t
have a Religious System, but denominations have systems.
There are dangers in focusing on systems that involve
human beings rather than deliveries or hydraulics. I am reminded of the first rule for graduate students in ethology: Don't use cats. Cats mess up your data. Humans mess up system data. I am very much at the point
where I doubt many references to systemic
racism, systemic oppression, systemic causes of homelessness. Give evidence for the systemic nature of
such things. Merely being widespread
doesn’t cover it. Show me that there is
something overarching, something beyond individual decisions, where we might
make a change and see an effect. Even legislation affecting such things are not
quite a system - though I admit that is getting us closer.
However, let me grant that some areas of human interaction
may still pass that test. I still think
it a dangerous focus. Fascination with
the system takes our attention away from individuals and their decisions. If the system gets credit or blame, then
individuals are seen as having less agency.
I do not say that everyone who focuses on system necessarily neglects the
individual. Yet the temptation to do so seems clear. We can only look in so
many places at once.
We also become fascinated with that type of solution, looking for those elegances of a little tweak there yielding great results
elsewhere. We are forever waiting for
the great cost-savings of preventive medicine for example, and sometimes we do things that
seem to help, like early screenings. Yet
mostly not. We become enamored of the butterfly effect, of a swallowtail in Rio
de Janeiro causing a tornado in Arkansas. But that works both ways. Sometimes large local effects are simply
swallowed up in the whole, affecting nothing.
Sometimes setting off a bomb in Rio doesn’t even affect the rest of Rio
that much. It is a particular unreality
beloved by our culture, because it gives us hope of being powerful after all. I
am butterfly, hear me roar. It is, I agree,
a noble ideal to do the right thing on the slim hope it will help. But there is a darkness underneath that. When we have false hopes that do not come
about, the temptation increases to become angry that someone, somewhere, has
ruined things.
We see exactly this anger in advocacy groups today, so I
don’t think calling it a temptation is merely theoretical on my part. Governments have enforced changes that allowed
us to pick the low-hanging fruit.
Hard-working black kids with IQs of 140 aren’t encountering any problems
getting a college education at this point. Cities aren’t dumping raw sewage
into rivers anymore. To make an analogy, if a board is lying on your lawn the
grass underneath it will turn yellow and eventually die. If you pick up the board, the grass recovers
rather dramatically. But that does not
mean that all bad lawns are the result of boards, with our goal being to find
more boards to pick up. Yet system-focus seems to breed this anger. Not only have many butterflies flapped, but
we set off a bomb, and still –nothing.
Evil forces are interfering with the system. They are preventing the system from changing. Yet if it’s not a systems problem, no
amount of bombs will change things. Well, change is difficult for people. Yes it is, and even more difficult when
the changes you are insisting on won’t change the result.
System focus causes our reward and punishment to go into
personal actions directed toward the system, not individuals. We praise or excoriate people for what they have done for the system. This
darling little girl raised money with her lemonade stand to give to racial
justice. How does that work, exactly? She will end up giving it to some group who believes it's all system. Or, we consider this man dangerous
because he said something bad about our group or about a program we like, not
because he has done anything wrong to any person. Cancel culture does not
hesitate to sacrifice individual people, formed in the image of God, in hopes
of doing good for The System, and systemic problems. How much worse when that particular system is
not the cause or is not even a system.
System focus tempts us to focus on powerful people rather
than the individual opportunities for cruelty and kindness that are in our
everyday lives. Again, while this is not necessarily
so – there are people who can keep focus on both, but the odds go down. We put more and more of our energy into
leveraging powerful people, or the great forces of our time, or becoming a tiny
piece of a great whole rather doing the truly great acts nearby. Having a platform, or getting into the news
becomes the goal. We pursue athletes and
entertainers for our cause. We try to be powerful on FB or Twitter to change the world that way.
Rather than simply doing good.
I am going to go to the practical theology of all this next, and I am betting that most of you can see the outlines of what that will be.
4 comments:
As someone who deals with literal (computer) systems day to say, the fundamental thing to remember is that any system is designed by humans, operated by humans, and repaired by humans. Every such system will reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the designers, even if, maybe especially if, the responsibility for the design is diffused across multiple groups.
A lot of "systems" are models of reality, with simplifications to clear away the unimportant details.
The "systems" aren't things people planned, but ways other people interpret the emergent phenomena.
"They constantly try to escape
From the darkness outside and within
By dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good." T.S. Eliot
There also seems to be a desire (with apologies to Anna Russell) to believe "that everything I do that's wrong/Is/Someone else's fau-ault!"
Post a Comment