Listening to Ryan Glasspiegel today talking about why he bet on Harris late in the campaign. He reasoned that it was looking like a tossup, both sides would cheat if they could, but the swing states had Democratic governors and it's always easier to cheat for more votes in cities. That is not terrible reasoning, but illustrates that large realities can overwhelm even accurate subtleties. Hugh Hewitt's If It's Not Close They Can't Cheat is bout 20 years old, I think.
He seems to have made it back betting Trump for the popular vote, which was 4-1 against even the day before.
I would put my money on the nose of a pony before I put it on a political race.
No comments:
Post a Comment