Monday, January 30, 2023

Presentism

 "For his time" is no longer considered a meaningful argument when discussing whether someone is racist (or -ist, -ist, -phobic, whatever). This is because it is not merely what the attitude is, but that it is not of the present. Presentism is as important as ideology, because my usual complaint about politics driven by social rather than intellectual premises still occurs. It is not just high school girls, disdaining you for not knowing what boot heights are fashionable this year, but many others, who focus on whether something is cultural appropriation or said using the exact right phrases. Those others skew urban, and formally educated, and socially obsessed, and thus settle in to left-leaning politics because that fits into their ecosystem better. So do not ask for context. There is no context since last Tuesday.

I mean, how different is this from Maureen Dowd, really?


Or (ahem) the cast of SNL?

CS Lewis: "All that is not eternal is eternally out of date."

3 comments:

Thomas Doubting said...

If you haven't seen it yet, you might be interested in current American History Association president James Sweet's column addressing the problem of presentism, which is now preceded by his apology to all those in the AHA he harmed in writing against presentism.

Is History History?

Assistant Village Idiot said...

If by "interested" you mean infuriated and can't get it out of my head on my walk, you are probably correct.

Thomas Doubting said...

Well, I apologize for ruining a good walk.