Over at ACX, he asks "How do AI's political opinions change as they get smarter and better trained?"
His puckish subheading is "Future Matrioshka brains will be pro-immigration Buddhist gun nuts." I have joyfully ambivalent feelings about this.
Over at ACX, he asks "How do AI's political opinions change as they get smarter and better trained?"
His puckish subheading is "Future Matrioshka brains will be pro-immigration Buddhist gun nuts." I have joyfully ambivalent feelings about this.
2 comments:
Word salad is certainly more sensible than some of the woke pronouncements.
"These results suggest that models may cease to provide accurate answers as we start to use them for increasingly challenging tasks where humans cannot provide accurate supervision. Instead, these models may simply provide incorrect answers that appear correct to us."
Exactly.
The systems do not--cannot--provide understanding, which is what we really want to back any answers it may give us.
Don't try to run it on social/moral problems where there are competing values.
Post a Comment