I mentioned WASPs voluntarily giving up power, either
because they believe in the system as good for all of us and those are the
rules, or for conscience sake in a more direct way. I don’t see where else this
has happened. The closest I can see is
the practice of empires to extend some power to competent individuals in
conquered states. They were brought to
the capital, or given authority in their home territories. It did seem to work
pretty well. Yet that’s not quite the
same thing as extending power to a new group of people. In empire, there is a vacuum that needs to be
filled. Someone is going to have to run
the new place. No one back home is actually giving up anything.
The logic and the emotions of such things are far apart.
Those receiving power very much believe they are entitled to it. They deserve
it. It is not some gift that is being bestowed on them, it is a right. Their point is pretty strong. Women should be able to own property. Black people should be able to vote. Once the
real situation has been laid bare, it is a serious act of discrimination to
refuse it. Even delaying justice can be seen as a type of oppression.
Those ceding power have something of a resentment that
bubbles up that is more than just the usual wrench that comes from giving
things up. Yes, I suppose it’s only
fair. But you know, we didn’t have to.
We could have designed it so that we didn’t give up anything. That’s what
everyone else does. You wouldn’t have liked
being born in other times and places.
“Oh no, don’t try and pull that on us. We don’t have power
because you gave it to us. We have it
because it’s the right thing to do!”
Except – just humor me
for a moment here. Those values don’t have any meaning outside of certain
contexts.
“Contexts be damned.
These are universal rights.”
The rest of the
universe doesn’t seem to think so. Only in certain countries, starting with America, is the obvious even a possibility.
“Look, you’re the guys who keep saying these rights are from
God, and not dependent on anything that men say. You can’t switch off now just because it’s
convenient and say it’s all arbitrary.”
Well, that’s pretty
much why we’re going along with this, even at our own cost. Everyone else might
require everyone to put in a certain amount of labor for us. We think you should make your own decisions about labor.
“This is crazy talk.
You didn’t invent these ideas.
They’ve been around for centuries.
You didn’t build that.”
Actually, we did. The
materials have been lying around for centuries, but no one made them into a
house.
“You built it? You
built it with our labor – slaves, miners, foresters, soldiers”
Those were our people
too. Yet even if they weren’t, maybe you‘d
have been happier building pyramids. Or
galley ships. Those look nice when they’re done.
“I can’t believe I’m hearing this.”
The part that’s hard
to believe is that someone’s letting you say it. Throw darts at a map and a
timeline, see what you get.
“So you think you’re going to somehow just take your marbles
and go home, some Ayn Rand thing where all you supposedly better people can just
keep what you want?
No, not at all. We kinda like how this has turned out, even
though it isn’t quite what we thought it would be. It’s been good to have
you. You’ve improved the place – well,
mostly – and we’re grateful for that. But there’s another right we’re only
going to share, not give up.
“Which is?”
The right to think
you’re being ungrateful assholes. You can think that about us, too, if you
like. We won’t stop you.
4 comments:
Hmmm. I don't know. Isn't it kind of like returning stolen goods? It's nice if I do that and encounter gratitude and kindness instead of blame, but more than I really expect. Certainly justice requires that the recipient acknowledge I did the right thing--but gratitude?
My sour attitude has more to do with skepticism that I was in possession of anything wrongful to begin with. Not to mention doubt that there's any justice in resenting me for what my ancestors did, or what someone's ancestors' neighboring cultures did thousands of miles from where my ancestors lived. Show me some inequities today, and I'll be happy to address them. I'm not that interested in talking about who had a headstart.
One thing I sure agree about: I'm glad I'm not living in an earlier age.
Well, that made me chuckle.
But, let me get on about these universal rights... It is my closely held principle that if another individual must be compelled to labor on my behalf, that whatever benefit I gain from his labors cannot be a right.
Thus, medical care cannot be a right. Food and shelter cannot be rights. Education cannot be a right. Rights really are limited to those things pertaining to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Keep in mind that the pursuit of happiness covers the right to own property so that one may pursue the means to gain those things that are not rights -- food, shelter, medical care, etc.
So, you still have those voices going on inside your head, AVI? Just checking.
Fred
Fantastic essay! This topic gets little discussion, but I think about it often. Bonus, that great laugh at the end! I have been following Professor Peterson. University of Toronto, and I'd so enjoy getting his reaction to this concept.
Post a Comment