My son’s podcast out of First Methodist discussed church
discipline, which got me thinking, and I recalled a couple of incidents. I am
obscuring the details, which is especially important as I may have some of them
wrong anyway. I was not directly
involved in either. Two women who were
pillars of their church were in ongoing argument that was disrupting the
congregation’s ability to do ministry. I don’t know if communion was ever
denied, or if it was just that the pastor sat them down and said he would
henceforth deny communion if they did not reconcile, but it apparently worked. A later pastor identified the act as a
turning point in the seriousness of the church and the growth of its
ministries.
There was a couple in the church, both successful and
prominent – one locally, one statewide – who were living together unmarried and
wanted to join the church. This was
denied until after they married, at which point they reapplied and were
accepted. Interestingly, they were not
denied communion during this period. The
reasoning, as it came to me secondhand, was that the Lord’s Supper is a point in
time. One’s approach to the sacrament
extends back in time, so that it is also part of a week or a season, but one’s
attitude at the moment of partaking cannot be known to the pastor or
congregation. In contrast, both marriage
and joining the church are products of lifetime decisions and involve ongoing
intentionality. Membership and communion were not being judged as greater or
lesser than the other, but along different axes. I don’t know if those are the answers I would
come up with, but I at least see the reasoning.
No comments:
Post a Comment