In the discussions of free speech, hate speech, and safe
areas of college campuses, schools use this member/community framing
consistently. I don’t think I much questioned it until recently. Yet an
alternate framing is not only possible, but I think, clearer: you are a customer purchasing a service. All
the rhetoric of colleges is geared to steer you away from that idea. You are not a mere purchaser, you are a
member of a club. You are not just learning some information, you are part of a
community. That’s why they have
sports teams, and why they have alumni gatherings and newsletters, so that
after you leave they can hit you up for money you can remain part of the community. “Community”
sounds like something you would want more of in your life, and they are
offering it to you. Famous or accomplished people who you never saw or even
attended entirely different years? – no
matter, you are both part of the community.
I completely get it. I considered
my college to be my “real” peer group after graduation for at least a few
years, and that faded only gradually. I didn’t follow the sports teams for
decades, but now that the basketball and football teams are just a little
better I check in on them at the end of the season a bit. I notice if some
person in the news went to my school. (My school. Hmm, there it is.)
Prestigious schools really sell that idea, that you are
qualifying to belong to some rather exclusive club. Lifetime membership.
Visiting when my first son was looking at colleges, and not
fully liking the culture (everyone seemed to play sports with sticks and be
majoring in International Relations or some other world-running career), then
having my second son display no interest at all drained most of the remaining
juice out. They both went to another
college, deeply evangelical, which provided a bit more reality to the
continuing community aspect.
So there was a day when the idea of college as community
meant something to me, but I view it with much more distance now. The school
has an interest in continuing to whisper “community” to me, but is there much
else that makes it true?
Just for amusement, make the leap to thinking “Okay, just
hypothetically, let’s say that this is all just crap that meets the needs of
some individuals. That it is possibly
parasitic and at best symbiotic.” The
light changes quickly. It becomes clear
that those who pass through over a few years influence the culture very little
- only in aggregate, and indirectly. Those who are there for decades get to
create the culture in their own image.
They make the club rules, written and unwritten. Worse, it is only those
permanent members who really like this culture-enforcement stuff and are
willing to put energy into it who make the rules. Those who want to be left
alone to teach classes and do research in their fields are at a disadvantage
here.
That subset of permanent residents, at colleges as
everywhere, are the ones who have speech codes. They call the tune of what can
and cannot be said, and convince you that you believe it to. They have every
interest in getting rid of people who don’t fit. Elementary and secondary schools, churches,
professions, snowmobile clubs, political parties, towns, teams. All of those are, in a much fuller sense,
communities. Maybe colleges should no
longer be thought of that way at all.
1 comment:
It appears that our colleges and universities are not preparing those attending for life out in the wild where people live their lives and don't care about trigger warnings or might upset those self-absorbed precious darlings (saying which I believe IS a macro-aggression; live with it and get over yourselves).
Safe places/zones: Must be a room for one person only; two is or will be "unsafe".
Post a Comment