Retriever sent along an interesting link about blaming people for what goes wrong, including blaming yourself. It’s a good article that links to real
research, so you may find it worth your while.
Barker is clearly not a professional in either psychology or research,
but he does seem to be a reasonably clever guy who is very popular these days
talking about self-help. At least, I
conclude he is not a professional because I cannot find any credentials
discussed anywhere on the web. He tells
you who he writes for and what he does, which is perhaps appropriate for a
positive-thinking self-help guy, as if saying
Those things don’t matter. What matters is if I can produce good material
or not.
There are some things you should be cautious about in
reading such material however – things that you know but I am reminding you
about.
- He has no obligation to report research that points in another direction or clouds his preferred narrative in any way.
- Just because people who do X have preferred outcome Y, it does not mean that you are going to be able to do X yourself, nor that even if you succeed at doing X, Y will happen to you as well.
Let me expand on that last just a bit. In this case, Eric Barker claims that people
who blame less are more productive, implying that if you reduce blaming, you
will become more productive as well.
This is not necessarily so. You
may have a set-point of how much you are going to blame, that can be changed
only slightly, or with enormous effort.
Barker may think you can turn it on and of, but you may be wired for the
amount of blame you engage in, and your inability to change that be just one
more thing to kick yourself about.
When I started in this biz years ago, there was a
psychologist who kept a number of paper bags in his office. He used them to illustrate his favorite
lesson, that guilt was unnecessary. He
would tell people to put their guilt in a bag by blowing it up, then have them
pop it. Observers noted that this never
seemed to have the least positive effect on his patients, but he had been doing
it for 40 years and wasn’t going to change now. Pop psych strategies often have
this weakness. If they don’t work, it is
somehow your fault for not activating the technique properly.
Not that you shouldn’t try them. Sometimes you can make the adjustment and
they do create an upward spiral. At a minimum, they can remind you that the
opposite isn’t likely to help – that blaming others or feeling more guilty
doesn’t have a track record of improving outcomes either, allowing you to
distract yourself for a bit.
2 comments:
Might want to check your spell check: "enormouse effort. Barker may think you can turn it on and of, but you may be wired for the amount of blame you encgage "
Blame doesn't interest me much beyond the point of identifying something to change in the future. But if something goes wrong, I want to know why, if possible. When I deal with people who can't bear even the possibility of accepting blame, I assume I can never expect anything better from them than I just got, which may not be enough to warrant further contact with them. They're like a machine running amok, no regulator and no off-switch.
Post a Comment