NPR did a short piece on the Woodstock Museum this morning. The 1969 event has taken on mythic proportions, both positive and negative.
Here's what you need to know: It was an outdoor concert. A lot of people went to it. That's it.
Because the crowd kept growing, from an expected .25% of the population from 15-30 to a full .5%, the people there decided that they had participated in an earth-changing event. They were aided in this idea by several irrelevant factors:
1. They were young and had not finished myelinating, and were still narcissistic enough to believe that whatever happened to them and their friends was more important than other things happening in the world. Anything that felt so powerful to them must be significant, right? It's the same thing that happens at the end of co-ed adolescent summer camp every week of the summer.
2. They were taking drugs, in particular marijuana, which is noted for its ability to convince you that random events have cosmic importance.
3. The performers had never played before crowds this big and all concluded that they must be hotter stuff than they had thought before.
4. The attendees were still a minuscule minority, which allowed them to think they were an elite of coolness. Coolness, you may recall from reading Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, is what everyone is supposedly looking for.
5. The movie and record people saw dollar signs if they could bring out stuff to sell that reinforced the above notions. My generation has always been easily manipulated by people selling us stuff on the basis of telling us that we are more important than other people.
6. A lot of guys reportedly got laid, which made the males who hadn't gone feel they had missed an important opportunity.
Just so we're clear on the concept, these are the true descendants of Woodstock: The Flight of the Conchords.
(H/T Neco Dracones)
5 comments:
I take exception to your comments that all the performers thought they were hotter stuff than they actually were. Actually, The Who hated the experience of Woodstock because it was seen as just that - an experience rather than a concert. In fact, some pseudo-revolutionary jumped on stage to make a speech, and Pete Townshend kicked his ass off the stage. For at least one band, this was not the pronouncement of a new era. Perhaps why The Who shortly after issued their great song "Won't Get Fooled Again."
I am glad to exempt The Who from my generalization. There may be one or two others.
You gotta love the Flight of the ConChords. This piece reminds me of Richie Havens - and about two dozen other performers.
At last year's Heiligendamm G8 Summit, one of the young German protesters interviewed said that he was there because he wanted to experience something like Woodstock. I remember seeing Jimmy Hendrix and lots of mud on TV and being very grateful for not being there. The mud and ODs are somehow erased from the mythical picture.
They were young and had not finished myelinating, and were still narcissistic enough to believe that whatever happened to them and their friends was more important than other things happening in the world.
As far as I can tell, the only that's changed for the Woodstock generation is they've gotten older. Myelinating I'm not so sure about.
Post a Comment