A young friend who was at a social event with me last year,
listening to me going on about something-or-other grinned and said “I’ve never
heard someone interrupt his own story to tell another story.” My brother and two oldest sons were present,
who shrugged and told him this is normal Wyman behavior, just more pronounced
with me. I have been known to let the
kite string out longer than that, interrupting a first digression with a second
before reeling it in. I choose my
audience for this, and it requires a fair bit of drama and expression to
accomplish this. One’s face, hands, and
all the tricks of tone and volume are rather like punctuation. I do voices, too.
My writing is similar, with parentheses, italics,
capitalisations, enhanced punctuation, and footnotes. I keep speaking in
asides. One would think I would be using hyperlinks more. I have some sense
that I prefer to keep everything on one page. I know from my own experience
that if one follows a hyperlink, it might be a while before the hyperlink tree
is finished, and I like everyone to pay attention to the little thought I
started from. I wonder who among the essay-writers of a previous era would take
to hyperlinking. CS Lewis makes so many references to authors, eras, and
hundreds of works that I think he might have liked it, allowing him to include
a level of precision in his references that would be lengthy otherwise. On the other hand, it might have slowed him
up, painstakingly linking to an entire semester’s worth of reading in every
introduction.
Yet reading with hyperlinks is a joy for me. I can follow or not as I choose. Sometimes just knowing that there is a deeper explanation or a full
example is enough for me to go on. For example, in many areas of study everyday
words have a specific meaning in the field: Interference,
depression, culture, voluntary. I ran across the word “starlike” in a
discussion of population expansion. The mere fact that it was hyperlinked told
me that it was a term of art for those in the field, rather than a flight of
poetic fancy from that particular author.
I had never seen it, but guessed at its meaning, which was confirmed in
the next few sentences. I didn’t need to
click the link, but it was helpful that the link was there. At other times a hyperlink is necessary for
me, as I am not quite such what the author means.
Or it just looks like a fun digression. There’s that, too. I can get lost in
Wikipedia for a couple of hours quite easily.
This kind of self-interruptions on top of self-interruptions seems more common among women than among men. What is really amazing to me is that many of them can actually pop up the levels back out of the nested interrupts. A thing of beauty, should be diagrammed to be fully appreciated.
ReplyDelete