The way the colors landed plays out well for conservatives, who get the red pill, representing reality. I don't know if that was intended in "The Matrix." I rather doubt it. Rog Phillips wrote a science fiction story in the 1950's in which the reality-representing pill was yellow, though it was ambiguous which environment was the real one. I would protest that I don't want either pill, I want what happens without pills, but it's a literary device, and has more drama.
The men's rights movement also uses the concept in terms of red and blue pills, though I am not familiar with whether they mean that red is reality, or just "our way of looking at things." Obviously, the two will be related. I think they mean that taking the blue pill is a denial of biological reality, and imposing a created power structure by social force.
Side note: I think most people credit that men's rights advocates have some legitimate complaints, but that they include a lot of pretty disturbing people. I could say that at work without getting into any trouble. I couldn't say the same thing about women's rights advocates. There may be a punching-up, punching-down element to that. Not a fully sustainable one, given who gets to be in Congress, run for president, or be a media star, but there's enough everyday reality to keep it afloat.
Back to reality. Terrible joke, sorry. I made a FB comment a few years ago about my news feed skewing liberal, and a second-cousin replied that "reality skews liberal." I did not confront him with the later news reports that FB was indeed putting its thumb on the scale, but I did feel vindicated. Conservatives and especially libertarians feel the same way about their beliefs, that no pill is necessary. If you just take life as it is, you will gravitate to their POV. That is not only the biological reality that men's rights people assure us is more powerful than acknowledged, but the economic reality that market pressures are what naturally occurs, not an imposed system. There is an additional element of believing that human beings have long-standing ways of behaving and perceiving, whether that is inherited culture or hard-wired. Well, we all think that, of course. I think it is likely that we move in the direction of social pressure. (Though for some of us, there is a reflexive attitude against social pressure as well.) In the face of that, one would have to drift blue because of media and entertainment, unless one took precautions against it. Taking a red pill, for example.
One of my arguments against liberals is that they do have many house-of-cards beliefs, that reality can be remade or reimagined with just a little (government, expensive) effort. The replication crisis in the social sciences is not going to undermine conservative beliefs, after all. Even if undermined by enormous destruction of their evidence, few liberals will change their minds, but that's how we all are. My argument against conservatives is the mirror of that. Too many believe that there's not really any way to change things, so let's not even try. I am in agreement with them that reality is not as malleable as the educated folk seem to believe. However, we are not the same men and women as even our near ancestors. There are continuities in personality and culture, sometimes over enormous periods of time, certainly. That alone suggests they may not change much, or not reliably. Yet even I find passages from colonial diaries strange, not quite understandable.
Assistant Village Idiot: The way the colors landed plays out well for conservatives, who get the red pill, representing reality. I don't know if that was intended in "The Matrix."
ReplyDeleteRed for Republicans and Blue for Democrats didn't become standard until the 2000 election. "The Matrix" was released in 1999.
The inherent problem with the red pill-blue pill analogy is the strict and therefore misleading dichotomy it entails, accentuating extremist beliefs.
Assistant Village Idiot: One of my arguments against liberals is that they do have many house-of-cards beliefs, that reality can be remade or reimagined with just a little (government, expensive) effort.
Reality-based community: The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' [...] 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do'.
Assistant Village Idiot: There are continuities in personality and culture, sometimes over enormous periods of time, certainly.
People haven't radically changed, but cultural and political institutions certainly have and do change. Since the Renaissance, the world has moved towards greater and great equality; social, political, economic; while conservatism has worked to preserve long-standing mores and institutions.
Ahhhhhh; AVI, it appears you have been discovered by the Gang of Z.
ReplyDeleteSam L: Ahhhhhh
ReplyDeleteWe have found Assistant Village Idiot's posts to be better thought out than most, certainly not knee-jerk. And we agree in part with his views. However, there is a point to be made about black-and-white thinking, or rather, red-and-blue thinking entailed in the dramatic device of "The Matrix"; or concerning his comments about what he considered the 'reality-base community'.
We also read things like this:
Assistant Village Idiot: I think most people credit that men's rights advocates have some legitimate complaints, but that they include a lot of pretty disturbing people. I could say that at work without getting into any trouble. I couldn't say the same thing about women's rights advocates.
The women's rights movement is a vast widespread group, the majority of whom are not particularly 'disturbing people'. The men's rights movements is a much narrower group, representatives of a historically advantaged group, and with a large segment of 'pretty disturbing people', many of whom apparently think they deserve sex from women. In other words, there is a significant difference between the two groups, and therefore people's reaction to the equivalence.