Saturday, March 28, 2015

Jerks Vs. Cheaters Vs. Criminals. Plus Racism.

There has been universal brouhaha in New England about David Ortiz's extended essay defending himself.  Ortiz has been enormously popular, even worshiped  during his tenure with the Red Sox, but apparently that is not enough.  He seems to find it intolerable that absolutely everyone, even here, does not love him.  This oversensitivity and self-centeredness is pretty much why there are a few holdouts.

I don't think there's anyone in New England who hates the guy, but some of us are merely pleased that he hits a baseball well and does it for us, and otherwise find his act a bit tiresome. He can be a jerk.

I don't have any problem rooting for jerks on my sports teams. Some of my all-time favorites are Jim Rice, Danny Ainge, and Randy Moss. I am betting that a week's vacation spent in close quarters with any of my favorite teams might put me off rooting for them forever.

Ortiz also referenced PED's, and how people still doubt him and think his abilities are/were enhanced.  That would be cheating, and though more and more people give that a pass, I don't.  The lines can be fuzzy - some sports and some eras seem to have so many offenders that one is tempted to condemn only the worst, shrugging at the guys who were driving 70 in a 65 zone. Yet I do pretty quickly hit a point that I turn on a guy for cheating.  I wasn't paying attention at the time to the open secret that Manny Ramirez was a user, and feel I was robbed of a Red Sox WS win when I learned. People who used and stopped I can accept, though a bit grudgingly.

Criminality is another whole realm, I just turn off and stop rooting.  Guys who seem to be making an effort or turning things around can win me back.  But I tend to be pretty suspicious of life-changes.

The curious piece about Ortiz's rant was not his assertion that being more suspicious of him because he is Dominican is racist.  It was the automatic acceptance of this as true that floored me. Oh, well I agree with that! I don't know what else you'd call it.  Of course it's racist.

How so?  I am suspicious of every track and field record, especially for women, coming out of East Germany from 1960-90.  I'm a little suspicious of every T&F record, period. I am more suspicious of college athletes who are in the big, hypercompetitive conferences. I am suspicious of athletes coming from most Caribbean countries, white or black, Spanish, French, Dutch or English-speaking because PED's are legal in so many of them and they have had so many athletes test positive. Ditto Bulgarian weightlifters. I suspect power-hitters more than singles-hitters, linemen more than quarterbacks, and guys who hung out with Lance Armstrong more than golfers.

4 comments:

panjoomby said...

OT, but i read this & hoped there would be a comment from you there!
www.unz.com/isteve/great-moments-in-the-treatment-of-paranoid-schizophrenics/#respond

Assistant Village Idiot said...

Thanks. I just went there.

james said...

So did the ankle-biters... :-(

panjoomby said...

OT again, but i wanted you to know i enjoyed your comments there & i added:
@ assistant village idiot: thank you for your comments!

people who work with schizophrenics know that neuroleptic meds help - & without meds there is little to no hope. initial psychotic breaks happen in schizophrenic males between ages 18 & 21 (with signs of reclusiveness & oddity for many years before). schizophrenia is lifelong. It lowers one's lifespan into the 40s. many commit suicide. the meds are not perfect, but they help. i'd like to see someone deal with a schizophrenic in full psychotic break without meds - good luck.

in europe they are beating a dead horse of "marijuana causes schizophrenia" which is ridiculous & based on crap research (more based on ideology). sometimes pot can initiate one's initial psychotic break - but i guarantee that psychotic break was going to come eventually, even without pot. so suck it, europe!