tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post8232791409132459407..comments2024-03-27T03:19:11.216-04:00Comments on Assistant Village Idiot: WhomAssistant Village Idiothttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01978011985085795099noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-13656043766139276032013-08-14T01:36:53.667-04:002013-08-14T01:36:53.667-04:00Smiling to the world! This is great and excellent!...Smiling to the world! This is great and excellent! Sometimes we may be sad toward the world, but smile is always a <a href="http://www.ibaikal.com/de/cell-phones-cid2" rel="nofollow">Billiges android-Smartphone ohne Vertrag online kaufen</a> good friend in our side and keep us from away the terrible world~<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12314201824007509994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-20283399146926853712013-08-08T04:51:24.332-04:002013-08-08T04:51:24.332-04:00I. Need. To. cheapest phones Buy. This.I. Need. To. <a href="http://www.ibaikal.com/" rel="nofollow">cheapest phones</a> Buy. This.nongfu380https://www.blogger.com/profile/11780754420539039300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-50400204434297553472012-12-05T02:00:37.450-05:002012-12-05T02:00:37.450-05:00Hey guys, how have you been recently. I have some ...<br /><br>Hey guys, how have you been recently. I have some wonderful information to share with you <br><br>and if you're a gaming fan, you can't miss it. I know a reliable store to <br><br><a href="http://www.salediablo3.com" rel="nofollow">buy diablo 3 gold</a>which is really at low price and fast <br><br>delivery speed. Just click it to buy <a href="http://www.salediablo3.com" rel="nofollow">Cheap diablo 3 gold<br><br></a>. You will enjoy it.<br>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11787622835898604721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-61343996247731880162012-11-15T02:00:06.029-05:002012-11-15T02:00:06.029-05:00buy wow gold from reliable online store<br /><a title="buy wow gold" href="http://www.4wowgold.com" rel="nofollow">buy wow gold</a> from reliable online storeAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06074373472319670625noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-68314344124956999282012-07-21T01:59:00.863-04:002012-07-21T01:59:00.863-04:00it is deemed an wonderful, lovely, basic and since...it is deemed an wonderful, lovely, basic and sincere movie of an great idea. Now i'm a real supporter of the operate! I'd personally require a chunk involving sweet away the woods everyday.Diablo 3 goldhttp://www.d3face.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-49430320228754149712009-02-06T10:48:00.000-05:002009-02-06T10:48:00.000-05:00I strongly prefer "who" everywhere to "whom" used ...I strongly prefer "who" everywhere to "whom" used incorrectly.<BR/><BR/>And let's ditch that non-word "whomever" while we're at it.rightwingprofhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12419372059353408855noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-84268273870550568292009-02-06T07:38:00.000-05:002009-02-06T07:38:00.000-05:00More and more, "that" is being substituted for who...More and more, "that" is being substituted for who/whom, as in "She is the one THAT helped me," instead of "She is the one WHO helped me."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-60725428819015655192009-02-03T21:25:00.000-05:002009-02-03T21:25:00.000-05:00dative schmative. I recall from junior high senten...dative schmative. I recall from junior high sentence diagramming: who= subject, whom= not subject.<BR/><BR/>I would agree with the observation that "whom" is being used less and less. <BR/><BR/>I continue in the now apparently archaic use of whom, but do not not bother to correct anyone who uses it. One exception: some blonde clerk at a coop grocery who on July 4th had a t-shirt emblazoned with "we stole it from the Indians" along with misuse of who-whom. I corrected her grammar, but did not say what I was thinking: "lady, so why don't you go back to Europe?" As I have some Indian ancestry, I am somewhat neutral, but I find it an expression of bad faith that those who express guilt on the matter do not pack their bags, thus putting their money where their mouths are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-74973766370431106632009-02-03T19:31:00.000-05:002009-02-03T19:31:00.000-05:00I sure will, AVI. She never rubs it in because sh...I sure will, AVI. She never rubs it in because she is too sweet. :)<BR/><BR/>I am really enjoying your blog.Boethiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00755968985821460943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-52451066854222086492009-02-03T19:14:00.000-05:002009-02-03T19:14:00.000-05:00James you are correct. I am at least seven centur...James you are correct. I am at least seven centuries out of date. I reasoned (incorrectly) <I>whom was dative in OE, it's still around, it must still be dative.</I> Wikipedia has a nice summary of what happened: "The Old English language, current until approximately some time after the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066, had a dative case; however, the English case system gradually fell into disuse during the Middle English period, when the accusative and dative pronouns merged into a single objective pronoun used in both roles. This merging of accusative and dative functionality in Middle and Modern English has led most modern grammarians to discard the "accusative" and "dative" labels in English as obsolete, in favor of the term "objective"...<BR/><BR/>The pronoun <I>whom</I> is also a remnant of the dative case in English, descending from the Old English dative pronoun "hwām" (as opposed to the nominative "who", which descends from Old English "hwā") — though "whom" also absorbed the functions of the Old English accusative pronoun "hwone". Likewise, "him" is a remnant of both the Old English dative "him" and accusative "hine", "her" serves for both Old English dative "hire" and accusative "hīe", etc.<BR/><BR/>Boethius - I'll bet she does use who/whom properly according to the traditional system. And I'll bet she doesn't rub it in, either. Say hi for me.Assistant Village Idiothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01978011985085795099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-79257682134813122062009-02-03T12:12:00.000-05:002009-02-03T12:12:00.000-05:00Dani Cloutier always uses who/whom correctly.Dani Cloutier always uses who/whom correctly.Boethiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00755968985821460943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-10757724888686907072009-02-03T10:48:00.000-05:002009-02-03T10:48:00.000-05:00...and yet they still include questions about it o......and yet they still include questions about it occasionally on the SAT and I'm stuck trying to get a bunch of 10th and 12th graders to understand this mysterious word!Erinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12803753870981743904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19305198.post-64893198943946626982009-02-02T23:24:00.000-05:002009-02-02T23:24:00.000-05:00Not dative . . . objective. (I couldn't resist the...Not dative . . . objective. (I couldn't resist the call of the "obscure" and "unnecessary!")<BR/><BR/>To quote from my Christmas present, Sydney Greenbaum, Oxford English Grammar, p. 188: "<I>Who</I> and whom differ in case: <I>who</I> is subjective and <I>whom</I> is objective. . . . <I>who</I> is commonly also used for object functions except in formal style, where it is replaced by <I>whom</I> . . ."James Ernesthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06009015284162353300noreply@blogger.com